Cadaver Injection Course Evaluation Form Cadaver Injection Course Evaluation Form November 2025 Please complete the evaluation form to receive a link to the certificate of attendance. Step 1 of 5 20% Type of PhysicianRheumatologistFamily MedicineResidentSpecialistOtherReason for Attending: (ie. update knowledge, topics, speakers, credits)How would you rate the facilities:PoorFairGoodExcellentHow would you rate the program:PoorFairGoodExcellentHow would you rate the organisation:PoorFairGoodExcellent Please rate the importance to you of the following aspects of the Advanced CourseHow important are the following to you:1- Not Important23- Somewhat Important45- Extremely ImportantInformation gained through plenary presentationsInformation obtained in interactive workshopsQuestions raised that I will investigate laterConfirms that I am up to date in my clinical practiseTime spent with colleagues in sessionsTime spent with expertsHands on opportunities in workshops Please rate (circle) how well you think the format of this conference worked, i.e., the number and balance of plenary and workshop sessions.1- Did not work well23- Worked somewhat well45- Worked extremely wellAspects of the course I liked best were:Aspects of the course that could be improved:Are there changes or other educational formats (eg. informal discussion groups, hands on skill development) that you think we should try? Please be specific.Please list ideas and topics for next year’s program. Add specific topic (could be case-based) and ask for specific aspect.Please indicate which CanMEDS role(s) you felt were addressed during this course Medical expert Family medicine expert Communicator Collaborator Leader Health Advocate Scholar Professional As a result of this course, I will make the following change(s) to my practice:On a scale of 1-10, how likely are you to undertake the practice change(s) you noted above?1- Extremely Unlikely2345678910- Extremely LikelyBarrier(s) to change that I have to address include:Did you perceive any degree of bias in this course?NoYes Melanie Brisson - Evidence Based Principals and Best Practises in Ultrasound-Guided Joint InjectionsStrongly disagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly agreeThe learning objectives were metThe quality of the presentation was acceptable (clarity, purpose, etc.)The content was relevant to my practice.Recommendations were based on appropriate research findings and/or evidence.There was adequate time and quality in questioning/interactive aspects of the session.This program content enhanced my knowledge.Valerie Belanger - Prolotherapy and Viscosupplementation: General Principals, Indications and Practical ApplicationsStrongly disagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly agreeThe learning objectives were metThe quality of the presentation was acceptable (clarity, purpose, etc.)The content was relevant to my practice.Recommendations were based on appropriate research findings and/or evidence.There was adequate time and quality in questioning/interactive aspects of the session.This program content enhanced my knowledge.Martin Lamontagne - Advanced Insights into Ultrasound Guided Regenerative Medicine: Indications, Timing and RationaleStrongly disagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly agreeThe learning objectives were metThe quality of the presentation was acceptable (clarity, purpose, etc.)The content was relevant to my practice.Recommendations were based on appropriate research findings and/or evidence.There was adequate time and quality in questioning/interactive aspects of the session.This program content enhanced my knowledge.Alessandra Bruns - Sonoanatomy, Pathology and Needle Approach in the Wrist and HandStrongly disagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly agreeThe learning objectives were metThe quality of the presentation was acceptable (clarity, purpose, etc.)The content was relevant to my practice.Recommendations were based on appropriate research findings and/or evidence.There was adequate time and quality in questioning/interactive aspects of the session.This program content enhanced my knowledge.Melanie Brisson - Sonoanatomy, Pathology and Needle Approach in the KneeStrongly disagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly agreeThe learning objectives were metThe quality of the presentation was acceptable (clarity, purpose, etc.)The content was relevant to my practice.Recommendations were based on appropriate research findings and/or evidence.There was adequate time and quality in questioning/interactive aspects of the session.This program content enhanced my knowledge.Valerie Belanger - Nerve Pathologies in the Upper and Lower Extremities: Diagnosis and Interventional ApproachesStrongly disagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly agreeThe learning objectives were metThe quality of the presentation was acceptable (clarity, purpose, etc.)The content was relevant to my practice.Recommendations were based on appropriate research findings and/or evidence.There was adequate time and quality in questioning/interactive aspects of the session.This program content enhanced my knowledge.Abe Chaiton - Sonoanatomy, Pathology and Needle Approach in the ElbowStrongly disagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly agreeThe learning objectives were metThe quality of the presentation was acceptable (clarity, purpose, etc.)The content was relevant to my practice.Recommendations were based on appropriate research findings and/or evidence.There was adequate time and quality in questioning/interactive aspects of the session.This program content enhanced my knowledge.Alessandra Bruns - Sonoanatomy, Pathology and Needle Approach in the HipStrongly disagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly agreeThe learning objectives were metThe quality of the presentation was acceptable (clarity, purpose, etc.)The content was relevant to my practice.Recommendations were based on appropriate research findings and/or evidence.There was adequate time and quality in questioning/interactive aspects of the session.This program content enhanced my knowledge.Mohammad Bardi - Sonoanatomy, Pathology and Needle Approach in the ShoulderStrongly disagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly agreeThe learning objectives were metThe quality of the presentation was acceptable (clarity, purpose, etc.)The content was relevant to my practice.Recommendations were based on appropriate research findings and/or evidence.There was adequate time and quality in questioning/interactive aspects of the session.This program content enhanced my knowledge.Martin Lamontagne - Sonoanatomy, Relevant Pathology and Needle Approach in the Ankle and FootStrongly disagreeDisagreeNeutralAgreeStrongly agreeThe learning objectives were metThe quality of the presentation was acceptable (clarity, purpose, etc.)The content was relevant to my practice.Recommendations were based on appropriate research findings and/or evidence.There was adequate time and quality in questioning/interactive aspects of the session.This program content enhanced my knowledge. Please include any final comments including your thoughts on an annual injection course that focuses on more specific areas (ie. Upper extremity or lower extremity only). Please note that once you submit the survey you will receive a link for the certificate of attendance. Thank you